<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Giving &#8216;Fast Attack&#8217; A Bad Name?Houston LODD Differences</title>
	<atom:link href="http://backstepfirefighter.com/2010/03/09/giving-fast-attack-a-bad-namehouston-lodd-differences/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://backstepfirefighter.com/2010/03/09/giving-fast-attack-a-bad-namehouston-lodd-differences/</link>
	<description>To provide a point of critical thought about certain acts and events in the fire service while incorporating behavioral education and commentary in a referenced format.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 01:28:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: NY Firefighter</title>
		<link>http://backstepfirefighter.com/2010/03/09/giving-fast-attack-a-bad-namehouston-lodd-differences/comment-page-1/#comment-4946</link>
		<dc:creator>NY Firefighter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 17:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://backstepfirefighter.com/?p=1604#comment-4946</guid>
		<description>There is absolutely no reason for an interior firefighter to need to change the channel on the radio during an attack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is absolutely no reason for an interior firefighter to need to change the channel on the radio during an attack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Furthering Discussion of the Backstep Firefighter on the Houston LODD&#8217;s &#8211; The Fire Critic</title>
		<link>http://backstepfirefighter.com/2010/03/09/giving-fast-attack-a-bad-namehouston-lodd-differences/comment-page-1/#comment-404</link>
		<dc:creator>Furthering Discussion of the Backstep Firefighter on the Houston LODD&#8217;s &#8211; The Fire Critic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 20:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://backstepfirefighter.com/?p=1604#comment-404</guid>
		<description>[...] Discussion of the Backstep Firefighter on the Houston LODD&#8217;s View commentsComments    ShareBill Carey of Backstep Firefighter did a bang up job in discussing the similarities and differences in the 2005 Houston LODD and the 2009 Houston [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Discussion of the Backstep Firefighter on the Houston LODD&#8217;s View commentsComments    ShareBill Carey of Backstep Firefighter did a bang up job in discussing the similarities and differences in the 2005 Houston LODD and the 2009 Houston [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave LeBlanc</title>
		<link>http://backstepfirefighter.com/2010/03/09/giving-fast-attack-a-bad-namehouston-lodd-differences/comment-page-1/#comment-403</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave LeBlanc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://backstepfirefighter.com/?p=1604#comment-403</guid>
		<description>The radio issue is something that I am suprised we are still fighting in this day and age.  Until radio manufacturers are convinced to build a radio that is &quot;service oriented&quot; we will continue to fight these issues.

There are things we can control with existing equipment.  Radio programing that ensures that we do not have to change channels.  Safety channels programed so if your Department uses a repeater system, there are channels you can go to that will ensure Command hears emergency traffic.

Also how and where we carry our radios.  Radio pockets are convienent until you have to change a channel or adjust the volume.  Often they are built to a &quot;one size fits all radio&quot; standard and little radios end up buried deep in the pocket.

Radio straps offer an alternative, but if worn under the gear they can be difficult to access.  Also this requires that you are familiar with channel positions so you can &quot;count clicks&quot; because you can&#039;t often see the radio.  Radio straps over the gear are also an option, but the radio tend to take a beating which brings into play the issue of whether they will work.

Training on your equipment is a huge issue.  How many do it?  How many just think of it as a radio, and do the minimal training?  

I would agree that the tactic isn&#039;t necessarily the issue.  However, once again, it seems that we jump on the tactic bandwagon without looking at the other issues that surround the event.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The radio issue is something that I am suprised we are still fighting in this day and age.  Until radio manufacturers are convinced to build a radio that is &#8220;service oriented&#8221; we will continue to fight these issues.</p>
<p>There are things we can control with existing equipment.  Radio programing that ensures that we do not have to change channels.  Safety channels programed so if your Department uses a repeater system, there are channels you can go to that will ensure Command hears emergency traffic.</p>
<p>Also how and where we carry our radios.  Radio pockets are convienent until you have to change a channel or adjust the volume.  Often they are built to a &#8220;one size fits all radio&#8221; standard and little radios end up buried deep in the pocket.</p>
<p>Radio straps offer an alternative, but if worn under the gear they can be difficult to access.  Also this requires that you are familiar with channel positions so you can &#8220;count clicks&#8221; because you can&#8217;t often see the radio.  Radio straps over the gear are also an option, but the radio tend to take a beating which brings into play the issue of whether they will work.</p>
<p>Training on your equipment is a huge issue.  How many do it?  How many just think of it as a radio, and do the minimal training?  </p>
<p>I would agree that the tactic isn&#8217;t necessarily the issue.  However, once again, it seems that we jump on the tactic bandwagon without looking at the other issues that surround the event.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

